Skip to content
Kodvalley

Cybersecurity

AI & LLM Security Testing

Adversarial testing of chatbots, AI assistants and agents for prompt injection, data leakage and unsafe actions.

LLM01 prompt injection tested first
10 + 10 OWASP LLM and agentic risks
AI Act robustness evidence

Scope

What we test

Chatbots, AI assistants and agents can be manipulated through the text they read. A hidden instruction in an e-mail, web page or document can make them leak data or take actions nobody approved. We test your AI features the way attackers do and show you how to contain them.

Prompt injection

Direct and indirect instructions hidden in user input, documents and web content.

Data leakage

System prompts, customer data and secrets the model should never reveal.

Agents and tools

Function calls, MCP servers and plug-ins that act on behalf of users.

RAG and knowledge bases

Poisoned documents and access control in retrieval.

Guardrails and jailbreaks

How well your filters hold up against known bypass techniques.

Abuse and cost

Rate limits and unbounded consumption that drive up your bill.

Mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications

Every finding is linked to the 2025 OWASP list, the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications and MITRE ATLAS, so your developers know exactly what to fix.

LLM01

Prompt injection

LLM02

Sensitive information disclosure

LLM03

Supply chain

LLM04

Data and model poisoning

LLM05

Improper output handling

LLM06

Excessive agency

LLM07

System prompt leakage

LLM08

Vector and embedding weaknesses

LLM09

Misinformation

LLM10

Unbounded consumption

What you receive

  1. 01 Findings mapped to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS
  2. 02 Reproducible test cases for your team
  3. 03 Guardrail and architecture recommendations
  4. 04 Regression test set for future releases
  5. 05 Summary for EU AI Act documentation

Questions we often hear

We use a model from a large provider. Is that not already secure?

The provider secures the model. How your application uses it, what data it can read and which tools it can call is your responsibility, and that is where most issues are found.

Do you test AI agents that take actions?

Yes. Agents with tools, MCP servers or API access are tested for goal hijacking, tool misuse and privilege abuse, with safe limits agreed in advance.

Does this help with the EU AI Act?

The AI Act requires accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity for high-risk systems. Our report gives you documented evidence of adversarial testing.